Which MONA LISA® IUD to recommend?
For more information, refer to the articles below.
The Cu safe 300 IUD, a new concept in intrauterine contraception: first-year results of a large study follow-up of 1017 acceptors. Kurz & Meier-Oehlke, Adv Contracept 1991;7(2-3):291-300.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1950725)
Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of a copper intrauterine device (Cu Safe 300) in type 1 diabetic women. Kimmerle et al., Diabetes Care 1993;16(9):1227-1230.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8404424)
A randomized comparative study of the TCu380A and Cu-safe 300 IUDs. Van Kets et al., Adv Contracept 1995;11(2):123-129.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7491853)
Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C. UNDP et al., Contraception 1997;56(6): 341-352.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9494767)
Comparison of the performances of TCu380A and TCu380S IUDs up to five years. L. Bahamondes et al., Adv Contracept 1999;15(4):275-281.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11145369)
Five-year clinical experiences with Nova T380 copper IUD. Batar et al., Contraception 2002; 66(5):309-314.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12443960)
Clinical performance of the Nova T380 intrauterine device in routine use by the UK family planning and reproductive health research network: 5 year report. Cox et al., J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2002;28(2):69-72.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12396775)
A randomized trial on the clinical performance of Nova T380 and Gyne T380 Slimline copper IUDs, Haugan et al., Contraception 2007;75(3):171-176.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17303485)
Copper T380A intrauterine device for emergency contraception: a prospective, multicentre, cohort clinical trial. Wu et al., BJOG 2010;117(10): 1205-1210
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20618314)